Congress has always projected itself as a youth party that "empowers" the youth. Many may believe that congress has rightly done that also. Thinking about youth leaders of congress the names that comes to mind are Rahul and Priyanka gandhi, Milind Deora, Jyotiraditya Scindia, Naveen jindal, Priya dutt and Sachin pilot.
All looks good but now lets look at the "political" qualification and experience of ground realities of these politicians-
1.) Rahul and priyanka Gandhi- Children of Sonia gandhi
2.) Milind deora- Son of murli deora (congress minister)
3.) Jyotiraditya scindia- Son of Madhav Rao scindia (Congress minister)
4.) Naveen jindal- Son of O.P. Jindal (congress minister)
5.) Sachin pilot- Son of Rajesh pilot (Again congress minister)
6.) Priya dutt- Daughter of Sunil dutt ( Congress minister)
7.) 2 youth candidates hanpicked by Rahul gandhi for Lok sabha 2009- Check the criteria for selection here.
So if the criteria for calling itself a youth party is just chosing children of former ministers then I believe every political party in India have ministers which have children that can be easily inducted in political parties! But Isnt it better to chose deserving candidates rather then "youth" with no idea on how things work. Other parties have youth candidates which have risen from the grounds but they go unnoticed because though deserving they dont have any political godfather for publicity.
Children of Ministers- Youth party or Monarchy?
Never noticed this fact until there was a poll on CNN-BN. The Question was " Is BJP ahead of Congress in DIRECT states"
Direct states are those states where there is direct competition between BJP and Congress and no 3rd party is strong there. These are Delhi, Rajasthan, M.P., gujarat, Chattisgarh and 1-2 other states.
A whopping 92% people voted that YES BJP is ahead in direct states! The discussion then shifted as to why congress faires so poorly in DIRECT states. The reason that came out was that congress doesnt project any leaders while BJP alwayz project their leaders. With the exception of Sheila Dixit in Delhi congress doesnt project a leader in any direct state whereas BJP has chosen leaders for each state- Modi for gujarar, Raman singh for Chattisgarh etc.
It can be clearly seen that people are voting for clean and efficient leaders and 1 state whereas congress has fielded Dixit as CM (delhi) it has won easily.
But then why dont congress project leaders?? Why??
The ans not given by me but by the experts and anchor was due to a possible fear that they may become too strong and could hurt P.M. aspirations of the Gandhi family!
Congress is more or less run like a Monarchy. Jawaharlal Nehru, then Indra gandhi, then her son Sanjya gandhi, then Rajiv gandhi, now manmohan singh (mask for Sonia gandhi) and Rahul gandhi is being projected as the future P.M. whereas there are many well deserving and experienced and good leaders already. Most notable is Pranab mujherjee.
Even in today's situation people can very well see all leaders of BJP has risen from ranks and their are many prominent leaders like Modi, Chauhan, Sushma, Jaitley etc. Whereas congress doesnt seem to have a leader so strong that he can be made P.M. because they never project anyone except Rahul gandhi who hasnt done anything till now and in the recent past his statements are benifitting BJP more than Congress!!
So people better decide IS INDIA A DEMOCRACY or MONARCHY?
Below is an awsome video made by a concerned and well informed citizen exposing NDTV and their biasness towards a particular political party. Some biased reporters and channels bring bad name to whole of journalism world. Watch the video to know the truth.
Watching news on T.V. and keeping myself informed about world happenings is 1 of my hobbies. I had always shuffled across various news channels and would watch the 1 which had the interesting news on. I never suspected any channel of biasness until I came across few topics on Internet. 1 article led to another and after reading few of them I realised how some news channels are making people fool and are working with vested interests.
Some of the highlights of those articles which made me realise the facts were-
1.) Overhyped Varun gandhi's speech and absolutely no news about Vaiko's speech. ( If you don't know what Vaiko said just do a little google search ;) )
2.) Issuing a legal notice to a blogger who disclosed their true colours on his blog. (this was done by ndtv)
3.) Sensitive info given to terrorist by showing LIVE TELECAST during 26/11 and Kargil and claiming it as FREEDOM OF SPEECH (Again done by ndtv) and issuing legal notice to others when they exercised their right.
There are many points which cannot be mentioned in a single post.
The impact it has had is that it has created an environment where people only know half the truth and believe whatever is shown. When I talk with my friends who dont have much access to internet I am surprised to hear their thoughts and reasoning because they have access to only half info and are clueless about articles that surface on Blogs and Forums which tell the reality!!
Below is the link to a very nice blog post. The blogger has mentioned how he was evident follower of news channels and how some of them fooled him until he realized the truth. I recommend every person to read it once to be aware and stay away from this dangerous phenomena known as "Media Bias".
Read the full article
Read the full article
Also see-
The issue of Black money stashed abroad has made headlines in the past few days. BJP is blaming the congress for inaction while the congress is washing its hand off and saying that they are doing everything possible to get the money back.
But what has the govt really done? Is it just a poll issue? Are politicians involved? Is something fishy?
Know from the expert. Below is link to interview of leading charted accountant of India who is involved and has overseen this issue since 1986!!
Much doubts should be cleared after reading the interview.
Read the interview
Below is link to an article that shows that Rahul Gandhi ( The allegedly most eligible person to be PM ) and his mother is guilty of the offence of perjury under Sections 179 and 191 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and punishable under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). They are also guilty of offences under Section 125A of the Representation of People’s Act (RPA) 1951.
In addition he is also guilty of tendering false evidence under Section 199 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which reads as follows:
‘False Statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence/whoever, in any declaration made or subscribed by him which declaration any Court of Justice or any Public Servant or other person is bound or authorized by Law to receive as evidence of any fact, makes any Statement which is false and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, touching any point/material to the object for which the declaration is made or used shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave false evidence’.
It is quite obvious that the congress friendly media didnt raise a voice about it and our "strong" judicial system decided to ignore the incident.
But all Indians should be aware of what the truth is and decide what leaders they want for India.
Read the full article
Read the full article
New Delhi (PTI): Former CBI Director Joginder Singh on Monday claimed that the agency had proof that Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi had allegedly received USD 7.32 million as kickbacks in Rs 64 crore Bofors scam.
"There are documents with the CBI showing that Quattrocchi received USD 7.32 million. The documents have been given by the Swiss authorities themselves," the former CBI Director, who brought the documents from Switzerland, told PTI here.
He claimed that the documents were with the government and the CBI and also part of records in Delhi High Court.
Mr. Singh, who had gone to Switzerland in 1997 and brought nearly 500 pages of documents released by Swiss banks, said "when I took over, I found that the the CBI had a room full of documents relating to Bofors case but no one had touched them."
Mr. Singh said after bringing back the documents he had sent a report to the government in three months.
Asked why the government did not do anything, he said, "It is up to the government to accept it or not. I don't regret because I did my job."
Asked if the decision of dropping the name of Quattrocchi from the Interpol's Red Corner notice was wrong, he said "the government has all the rights...the CBI is not an independent agency. It has to carry out whatever the government says. You may not agree with it but there is option than to carry out whatever they say."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
